Geologic dating system erroneous


01-May-2020 07:52

geologic dating system erroneous-19

dating rasmus 36 denmark

The purpose of this paper is to describe briefly a few typical radiometric dating studies, out of hundreds of possible examples documented in the scientific literature, in which the ages are validated by other available information.

I have selected four examples from recent literature, mostly studies involving my work and that of a few close colleagues because it was easy to do so.

The Pierre Shale also contains volcanic ash that was erupted from volcanoes and then fell into the sea, where it was preserved as thin beds.

Creationists seem to think that a few examples of incorrect radiometric ages invalidate all of the results of radiometric dating, but such a conclusion is illogical.

Radiometric dating of rocks and minerals using naturally occurring, long-lived radioactive isotopes is troublesome for young-earth creationists because the techniques have provided overwhelming evidence of the antiquity of the earth and life.

Some so-called creation scientists have attempted to show that radiometric dating does not work on theoretical grounds (for example, Arndts and Overn 1981; Gill 1996) but such attempts invariably have fatal flaws (see Dalrymple 1984; York and Dalrymple 2000).

Only rarely does a creationist actually find an incorrect radiometric result (Austin 1996; Rugg and Austin 1998) that has not already been revealed and discussed in the scientific literature.

geologic dating system erroneous-80

sex dating in warm springs virginia

The creationist approach of focusing on examples where radiometric dating yields incorrect results is a curious one for two reasons.I could have selected many more examples but then this would have turned into a book rather than the intended short paper.